BiteByter

I already made the switch to Linux a couple of weeks ago. I also have helped some others with there Linux OS's. I've been endorsing it and the more people I can reach and word spreads the better. If no one is buying then maybe they will change. But I doubt it. I now have mono develop but am gravitating towards other languages instead, like C/C++, Java, Python, or Perl. The KDE development environment is very nice!:) I've already got about 4 or 5 people that switched there OS's.

I agree heavily with Marble Eater and this opinion won't be dissuaded. It is ridiculous the directions software is taking and I won�t be treated like a crook. I have been looking at UBUNTU as well as SUSE 10.2 and MONO and WINE are looking like viable alternatives. We have paid the price long enough and other people will eventually get it! I am guilty before innocent and this all plays into the government aspects � People who buy into this BS are living under a rock! Once this machine keeps rolling it won't be stopped! I will not live with such a machine! In fact due to this onset I have been backing up data and planning the switch for a while now! Can't wait to be free from the lies called an OS by MS! I don't think most people realize how good some linux distro's are not to mention they don't limit whta you do with your machine unlike windows whos owns you!

I am populating a datatable directly from an oledbdatareader. My SQL query is using a bunch of aggregate functions so I didn't want to use the same field names in the datatable. So I keep getting this error: System.ArgumentException: Column 'ColumnName' does not belong to table . at System.Data.DataRow.GetDataColumn(String columnName) at System.Data.DataRow.get_Item(String columnName) at search.getlist() Any ideas? Also this is a ASP application. I'm guessing it has something to do with table mappings.

What did you do? Give up on compiling and just put the source in there? Thats what I did. It works just really wanted it to compile.

Well, if anyone knows the correct way to compile it let me know.I just want ahead and put it in there as uncompiled and it works that way.Which is fine. I can use that while I'm debugging the windows application. Thanks.

It seems pretty weird and I am suspecting it's some bug in 2005. The other files and rest of the web pages compiled fine. I seen how they linked up and what this does is something completely different. Do you have any link that shows the difference between 2003 and 2005 web services?

Well, yeah. When I build it there its not compiled. I thought when it was compiled it was all one self contained unit. I also have it in a namespace guess I'm confused on how they did this. <WebService(Namespace:="http://www.mysite.org/virtualdirectorywhereserviceis")>

I also turned off windows authentication and used impersonating identitys to interact with it. But it says could not create type service.

Weird then. Since it works on my local host and not my web provider.

New to web services in 2005. I compiled my web service to my site and the .asmx file I believe isn't linked properly since It's compiled and that info is in the bin folder. This is what the .asmx file looks like <%@ WebService Language="VB" CodeBehind="~/App_Code/myservice.vb" Class="myservice" %> I'm guessing some compiler options are wrong. Since this file is pointing to an app_code folder which it doesn't even add. I set up a virtual directory so I am sure that is all right. Any suggestions to fix that to link it to the right place? I don't know how they link it to the .dll's